Showing posts with label Tribal Sovereignty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tribal Sovereignty. Show all posts

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Cracks In The Tribal Sovereignty Shield Are Starting To Appear

For over a decade corrupt tribal leaders all across the United States have used the shield of Tribal Sovereignty to protect themselves from prosecution.  As more and more cases work their way through  the courts many Judges are left scratching their heads wondering how this could happen and wondering when Congress will do something.

Sure, a few people have gone to jail such as Michael Thomas, the former Mashantucket Pequot tribal chairman.  But most tribal leaders just continue on in their corrupt ways.  They have learned much from the U.S. Government.  They have learned how to bribe, I mean "Lobby", Congress.  They have learned how to donate to political campaigns in return for favors.  They have learned how to use their money, I mean influence, to get their way.

But perhaps, just perhaps, things are starting to change:

(h/t originalpechanga.com)

The Press Enterprise - Ruling a setback for tribal sovereignty Court of Appeal ruling exposes a chink in the sovereign armor of the state’s tribes.

BY AARON CLAVERIE / STAFF WRITER
Published: May 29, 2015 Updated: May 30, 2015 8:43 p.m.

Excerpts:
#
The ruling, which was handed down Thursday, reverses a Riverside trial court’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a former casino dealer against five members of the Pechanga Gaming Commission who had revoked the dealer’s gaming license.

In 2013, the trial court dismissed the case filed by Benedict Cosentino of Temecula, saying the tribe was a sovereign nation and state courts did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
#
Cosentino appealed the Riverside court’s decision. This week’s ruling said the individual actions of particular commissioners do not shield them from liability if they use their official position to “intentionally harm” someone. (emph. added).

Read Full Article Here-->The Press Enterprise - Ruling a setback for tribal sovereignty Court of Appeal ruling exposes a chink in the sovereign armor of the state’s tribes.


Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Santa Ysabel Moving Forward With Online Poker

parttimepoker.com - Santa Ysabel Tribe in California Launches Online Poker Site PrivateTable.com

#
Why is this significant

The significance is two-fold. First, the obvious significance is for players in California as they may have a new, more trustworthy place to play.

For the rest of us, the significance lies in the precedent being set. Other tribes across the U.S will be watching what Santa Ysabel does with PrivateTable.com and will make decisions based on the results. Other tribes have, and absolutely still are, weighing the possibility of operating a Class II online poker site under their sovereign rights. Santa Ysabel is uniquely position to call out ‘first’ on this one for two key reasons:

•They don’t have much to lose. Santa Ysabel closed their land-based casino in February. If they are proven to be wrong regarding the legality of operating an online poker site as a tribe, they have no significant underlying business that can be harmed.

•They are in California, considered to be the gold mine for online gaming due to population and demographics. There is actual money to be made.

Read More Here -->parttimepoker.com - Santa Ysabel Tribe in California Launches Online Poker Site PrivateTable.com

Much More:

Santa Ysabel Interactive PrivateTable.com

4flush.com - Santa Ysabel Gambit Complicates California Online Poker Scene
by Haley Hintze on July 15, 2014

This week’s announcement by the cash-strapped Santa Ysabel tribal nation of an imminent rollout of real-money online poker for Californians, despite no formal state regulation, has added an interesting new twist to the neverending saga of the attempts to introduce and regulate the online game in the Golden State.  Whether or not the Santa Ysabels — also known as the Iipay Nation — move forward with their plans remains to be seen.

What’s for sure, however, is that an already-tipsy legislative apple cart in California’s state capital of Sacramento now has another element in play.  Regardless of the Santa Ysabels nation’s small financial size, the question now posed is a doozy: Do United States-based tribal nations even need federal or state approval to offer online poker, if they’ve already been cleared via the Department of the Interior to offer gambling on their own tribal lands?

Read More Here-->4flush.com - Santa Ysabel Gambit Complicates California Online Poker Scene

4flush.com - Online Poker Site Launched in California by Stand-Alone Tribe

onlinepokerreport.com - Bill or No Bill, Santa Ysabel Tribe To Push Forward With Online Poker in California

casino.org - California Tribe Claims Sovereignty, Launches Online Poker Site

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Gresham's Law

Gresham's Law is a a law of economics.  According to Wiki it is expressed as follows:

Gresham's law is an economic principle that states: "When a government compulsorily overvalues one type of money and undervalues another, the undervalued money will leave the country or disappear from circulation into hoards, while the overvalued money will flood into circulation."[1] It is commonly stated as: "Bad money drives out good", but is more accurately stated: "Bad money drives out good if their exchange rate is set by law."

Another expression of Gresham's Law is as folows:

"Two decades before the S.&L. crisis and the article on looting, Akerlof wrote about “Gresham’s dynamic” in a 1970 piece on “lemons”: “Dishonest dealings tend to drive honest dealings out of the market. The cost of dishonesty, therefore, lies not only in the amount by which the purchaser is cheated; the cost also must include the loss incurred from driving legitimate business out of existence.” NYT - William K. Black

One way to think about it is prohibition.  Prior to the prohibition of alcohol sales it was regulated and taxed.  After prohibition we saw the rise of a massive black market for alcohol.  This lead to over 10 years of intensive gang violence.  Our entire political system was being gamed by bootleggers.  Entire cities like Chicago were owned essentially by gangsters like Al Capone.

Any of you watching Boardwalk Empire, while this is a dramatization, will be familiar with politicians, government officials, judges, and police being bought off in order to keep the flow of liquor going which was supposed to be illegal.

Another example is the drug war.  The War on Drugs has done nothing to create the black market for drugs.  Selling drugs is more profitable than ever.  In the absence of any rules, laws, regulations, and oversight the bottom line becomes making as much profit as possible.  Honest business people will not touch illegal drug sales which leaves the markets to more unscrupulous forces that care about nothing but making money.

We saw this in Las Vegas in the 1940's to the 1970's.  A lack of regulations brought in the mafia which essentially ran Vegas for decades.  Skimming, rigged games, and other shady business practices were common.  Movies have been made about this legendary corruption such as Casino.

It's my view that we are seeing Gresham's Dynamic play out with Indian Casinos.  The NIGC is supposed to be regulating the casinos but it is not clear (at least not to me) how effective their regulating has been.

Tribal Sovereignty makes it even harder for the Federal Government to assert legal jurisdiction over tribal casinos.  At least at this point the Federal Government through the NIGC or other agencies have had for the most part a hands off approach to tribal gaming.

We all want to believe that the governing bodies of tribes are being honest with their tribal members about their business.  But we know based on news reporting that scandals have taken place at Tribal Casinos up and down the State of California.

There's a political nexus as well with politicians taking contributions from tribes in exchange for support for putting land into trust, supporting a casino development plan, or to keep the State from putting regulations on tribal casinos.  Or to keep the State from legalizing gaming in general.

There are several dynamics at work and not all work for the tribe.  In some cases Cities seek to take advantage of tribes demanding more money from them for infrastructure improvements than was previously negotiated.  In some cases tribes fight tribes to prevent each other from opening casinos.

All this has lead to some level of corruption in tribal gaming.  It may not be totally wide spread.  I am sure many tribes try to operate as fairly and honestly as they can given the environment.  But the lack of oversight and regulation has created an environment where the bottom line is to make as much money as possible by any means.

My opinion is that eventually this will lead to the Federal Government having to take a more active role in regulating tribal casinos.  It won't happen overnight but as more and more scandals get unearthed, as more people go to jail, and as more public attention is drawn to the issue the Federal Government will be forced to act unless tribal casinos clean up their act on their own.  Gresham's Dynamic suggests they won't.

Friday, June 15, 2012

Gaming Patents and Pala

Today's post is on the gaming patents behind slot machines.  Understanding patents can get pretty complicated particularly if one if not familiar with the intricate details of the invention.

First, a little Patent 101.  Let's say you invent something.  You would then like to sell that product or service you have invented.  But before one starts selling their invention they typically like to get some legal protection in the form of a patent.  The inventor then would draft their patent and submit it to the United States Patent and Trademark Office for consideration.

Often there are multiple inventors and Patent Attorneys need to be hired to do an exhaustive patent search to make sure the invention doesn't already exist.  More often than not an idea you may think is unique is already patented.

Usually the patent office rejects the first patent submission.  The inventors then decide if they are going to revise the patent and resubmit or abandon the project.  All this can cost a lot of money.  Usually the minimum amount a patent will cost is about $7000 to $10,000.  This is a rare case where the inventor can write the patent themselves, submit it themselves, do the patent search themselves, and address any concerns raised by the patent office themselves.

Patent costs can soar if a similar invention is found and legal challenges are mounted against the patent.  Every reiteration and resubmission a patent goes through costs more money.

But if the inventors make it through this process then they are the proud owners of a U.S. Patent.  It doesn't stop there though.  If one plans to sell their product or service internationally one may decide to pursue patenting their invention in other countries such as in Japan or the European Union.

After all that the owners of the patent can do several things.  First, then can produce and market their product on their own.  Or they can sell the patent to another company.  Or, more often than not, they can license their patent to another company or multiple companies who then use the patented technology to produce products and sell them.  The owners of the patent are often paid Royalties and/or Licensing Fees for the right to use their intellectual property (IP).

Further, a patent can be licensed and sub-licensed multiple times.  Even more complicated, if a company gets bought out that has a license to the technology then the company that bought the other company will assume ownership of that license.

Ok, for this discussion we also need a little background on Indian Gaming.  A good primer on Indian Gaming is on Wiki about Native American Gaming.  In a nut shell in the 1970's a couple of tribal members living on Indian Land in Minnesota received a property tax bill.  Feeling they did not owe the property tax since they were on Indian Land they challenged the State and County in court.  They lost.  They appealed that decision to the Supreme Court which not only reviewed the case but made a ruling that " not only that states do not have authority to tax Indians on Indian reservations, but that they also lack the authority to regulate Indian activities by Indians on Indian reservations. (from Wiki)"

This paved the way for tribal gaming under the premise of tribal sovereignty.   In 1980 the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians in California began operating a Bingo Hall.  The Indio Police and Riverside County Sheriff promptly shut down the Bingo Hall.  Cabazon took their case to the Supreme Court in 1986.  The Supreme Court once again "ruled that Indian gaming was to be regulated exclusively by Congress and the federal government, not state government; with tribal sovereignty upheld, the benefits of gaming became available to many tribes. (from Wiki)"

Indian Gaming was born but complications still arose.

One complication was in California where Class III gaming was still illegal (traditional slot machines, craps, roulette, etc).  California did have a State Lottery, Horse Race Tracks, and Poker Parlors but Class III gaming was still illegal.

Seeking ways to increase revenue tribes began looking at slot-like machines called Video Lottery Terminals.  Since Bingo was already legal they sought slot machines that used a Bingo Mechanism instead of the Random Number Generators most Class III slot machines have.  This lead to the creation of Class II Slot-like machines.

In the early days of Indian Gaming I remember people complaining about the machines.  They didn't like the printed ticket.  They wanted to feel the coins and hear the coins hit the tray.  In the late 1990's this lead to a push at least in California to make Class III gaming legal on Indian Reservations.  This lead to several tribes pursuing compacts with the State and ultimately lead to several ballot initiatives making Indian Gaming legal in California.

But while tribes could now operate Class III slot machines they were limited to 2000 machines per casino, had to pay the state a fee per machine, and still could not operate other games such as craps or roulette.

This lead to another round of inventions and patents that lead to the creation of crap-like and roulett-like games.  I know Pala and Pechange both have "Pala Craps" and roulette and "Pechanga Craps" and roulette.  Instead of rolling dice, cards are dealt that have pictures of dice.  In the case of roulette instead of a ball landing on a number the wheel a card is drawn from a spinning wheel with a number on it.

Those of you who remember the early days of Indian Gaming may also remember playing Black Jack where an ante or "fee" had to be paid to the House.  This was because at that time Black Jack had to be player banked and not house banked.  The house could not make money on the loses of players.

The first document I have here is an article that appeared in the Los Angeles Times in 1998 titled The Slot Machine That Isn't.

Here is an excerpt:

"The Pala tribe promptly commissioned a Nevada company called Sierra Design Group to build a gambling device that met all the requirements and still, as they say, quacked like a slot machine.

Six months and several million dollars later, Sierra Design rolled out the result.
It has the soul of a lottery but the look and feel of a slot machine.

The new system actually conducts a lottery as described in the compact. It's just that the gambler is hardly aware of it."
The Slot Machine That Isn't - Los Angeles Times



This patent for this slot machine was issued.  It's titled Video Lottery Game United States Patent US 6,168,521, B1.  The inventors of the patent are very familiar names:  Robert Luciano (Sierra Design Group), Art Bunce, Glenn Feldman, George Foreman, Jerome Levine, and on the last page Howard Dickstein was also added as an inventor.

Presumably this is the invention Pala commissioned and paid for.  Yet no where is Pala mentioned in the patent.  It could be there is another patent similar to this I have not yet seen.

Here is the patent:
Video Lottery Game United States Patent US 6,168,521, B1


 

Other patents were developed.  Two were developed by Jerry Turk who managed the Pala Casino for 7 years.  One of those patents is for Pala Craps and Pala Roulette.  The Pala Band of Mission Indians is the Assignee on one of the patents.
United States Patent US 7,540,498 B2 Systems and Methods for Card Games That Simulate Non-Card Casino Table...
United States Patent Application US 2005/0032569 A1 Methods and Systems For Interactive Lottery Game Jerry ...




In 2003 Alliance Gaming Corp bought Robert Luciano's Sierra Design Group. which is now known as Bally Technologies
Alliance to buy Reno’s Sierra Design Group


After Prop 5 passed Class III slot machines seemed to be preferred to Class II slot machines.  People who go to Vegas are familiar with Class III games and thus if they go to an Indian Casino with the same games there is a familiarity there that helps pry the dollars from their wallet.

But lately Class II machines are in resurgence.  First off, the NIGC does not regulate Class II machines.  Second, there are no limitations on how many Class II slot machines an Indian Casino can operate.  Indian Casinos are limited to 2000 (or 2500?) Class III machines.

Second, Indian Casinos have successfully developed their own brand and no longer rely on Vegas familiarity.  Indian Casinos now have their own unique games and even slot machines that their customers specifically come to play.

Thirdly, it is increasingly difficult to tell a Class II from a Class III machine. Often the only way to tell is by the internal mechanism.  But some Class II machines have made them easier to identify.  With each spin of the wheel there is a little bingo card near the top of the machine that displays the numbers drawn.

You thought you were playing a slot machine but you were really playing Bingo!